How to Be a Better Technical Writer

It’s difficult to understand exactly why technical writing is often mostly gobbledegook. But it seems that when people write, for example, regular emails, those emails are often short and concise. Yet, those same writers, when writing technical documents, often end up writing gobbledegook. Sadly, this phenomenon seems to also be true with (non-trained) technical writers. Unfortunately for their audience (readers), technical writers are often document “assemblers” and take for granted the “boilerplate” and other poorly written text they receive and sometimes even write.

Most technical writing problems fall into several readily-noticeable categories. Below, we list those categories (see: “Change this” and “To This:”) to show how to improve otherwise gobbledegook writing.

Outline: get organized —> Don’t write linearly.

Modern word processors present a page metaphor. This metaphor encourages us to jump in and to write linearly with little if any up-front organization. While writing linearly may be acceptable for a short letter or email, technical writing demands planning. To help plan, consider using an outlining tool or at least a writing environment that includes, or can import, outlines. Having this outline roadmap of what you want to say is critical as you dive into the writing details. Said another way, an outline is your roadmap and will help keep you on track.

(Note: Programmers who “jump in and start coding” with no preparation often end up with buggy programs, difficult-to-maintain code, or, worse yet, never actually finish their tasks.)

Avoid boilerplate gobbledegook

Many companies have so-called “boilerplate” text. This text is often full of unnecessary text, jargon, and other gobbeldegook to make their documents appear “professional” and consistent. Some companies believe more-pages-is-better (wow, look at all this text we can present to you!). Most of this boilerplate text is so poorly written nobody reads it. Therefore, if boilerplate text is required, and if you’re allowed, write that boilerplate text yourself or modify the jargon-laden existing boilerplate text so that it fits your writing project.

Know your audience and write for them

One of, if not the, the most important issues you face is writing to the correct audience. For example, if your audience is management staff, but you’re writing about a program’s algorithms and threading assumptions, then you’ve clearly missed the mark. Conversely, if you’re writing to the technical staff, but you are focusing on corporate objectives and other strategic goals, you probably also have missed the mark. Therefore, one of the first steps to take is to figure out who your audience is and then write to them.

Below are a few examples of typical technical writing issues…

Avoid redundant expressions

Avoid redundant expressions like “in the area of” or “green in color”. Redundant expressions unnecessarily tell us something we already know.

Change this: “He is experienced in the area of technical writing.”

To This: “He is an experienced technical writer.”

Change this: “The purpose of this document is to outline the corporate objectives.”

To this: “This document outlines the corporate objectives.”

(Note: Funnily enough, you’ll see redundant expressions even on sites that are supposed to help technical writers write better.)

Avoid ambiguous antecedents

When you start a second sentence with the word “It”, or other pronoun, it’s up to the reader to puzzle over what actual noun in the previous sentence “It” is referring.

Change this: “Many students use a computer to help them write a paper for an exam. It is often stressful.”

(Does “It’ in the second sentences refer to “computer”, “paper” or “exam”?)

To this: “Many students use a computer to help them write a paper during exams. Writing a paper is often stressful.”

Avoid passive voice

Passive voice has no actor and lacks action or interest.

Change this: “The proposal was written by the team.”

To This: The team wrote the proposal.

Because active voice has a subject acting, active voice is easier to read.

Avoid weak verbs

Drop-kick weak verbs like “provide”, “perform”, and similar. These verbs add nothing to technical writing. Instead of these verbs, use more descriptive verbs.

Change this: “The work to be performed in the area of task analysis will be completed by June 1.”

To this: “The team will analyze tasks by June 1.”

Which of the two above was easier to read for you to immediately grasp?

Use short sentences

Keep your sentences short. Don’t use commas, semi-colons, and other punctuation to justify longer sentences.

How to Be a Better Technical Writer (and Have Your Readers Better Understand What You Write)

Write simply. Use simple English.

Avoid Elegant variation:

When writing, avoid using synonyms to keep from repeating a word — even if that original word is the right choice.

The tendency by some writers is to look up in the thesaurus some synonym for a word to avoid using the same word over and over.

Simple language is always appreciated by the reader.

Change: “The use of software to write software modules has increased productivity. Modular utilization of software has also cut costs.”

To this: “The use of software to write software modules has increased productive. Modular use of software has also cut costs.”

In other words, don’t use “utilization” just to be different from using “use” the first time. “use” is fine in both sentences. (The examples above also have redundant expressions that the writer could have better worded.)

Avoid needless word complexity. For example, rather than writing “utilize”, try “use” (And similar).

Avoid long variants of verbs.

Include graphics or report samples to back up text

The old saying that a picture is worth a thousand words is applicable when clarifying complicated technical content. For example, when describing a complicated system output, such as a report, consider including a report output sample. Similarly, when describing a graph, show what a perspective graph would look like.

Including graphical output will help you get better feedback from users and from current and prospective customers. There are many tools that will help you prototype system outputs for reports, proposals, and for other technical documents.

Conclusion:

Writing for most people is difficult. Keys to success include:

  1. Getting organized
  2. Doing your research
  3. Outlining your writing to stay organized
  4. Writing simply
  5. Knowing and writing for your document’s audience
  6. Revising as necessary
  7. Reviewing with others

Writing is something we all do every day. Fortunately, becoming a better technical writer is not difficult. Strive to keep your writing simple with short sentences. And, use simple English. By making just a few adjustments to your technical writing, you will make it easier for your readers to better understand what you are trying to convey.

Enjoy!

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Please read our disclaimer available from our home page

We Have The Technology — Telework Now!

It’s fascinating watching the endless, and worsening daily traffic backups on the local news, which begs the question —why don’t more people telecommute – at least a day or two a week? Why isn’t there a national telecommuting initiative?

And, with the Coronovirus of 2020, a teleworking society is even more crucial.

Although telecommuting isn’t for every job, there are so many jobs where telecommuting can work (also called “teleworking”), telecommuting could make a huge difference not only in traffic congestion, but in other areas as well.

Below is a brief list with both the benefits and the challenges that exist.

Telecommuting Benefits:

  • Reduced traffic – with coordinated effort, virtually eliminate severe traffic tie-ups
  • Reduced need for a car in the first place
  • Reduced gas and other car expenses
  • Reduced environmental damage from car exhaust
  • Higher productivity – instead of sitting in traffic for hours a day, employees can be doing productive work
  • Smaller office spaces needed (money savings for company)
  • Employees are more awake since they don’t have to up early to “beat the traffic” (and for some still being exhausted after getting home late from traffic the previous workday)
  • Reduced daycare cost for kids
  • Be at home for sick family, pets, other needs
  • Reduced distractions (talking coworkers, unproductive meetings, and such)
  • Empowerment – feeling valued by the company
  • No need to endlessly build new or wider roads for ever-worsening traffic (hint: traffic is winning)
  • Happier and healthier employees

Telecommuting Challenges

  • Some don’t want to do it
    • There will be employees who want to work in an office. Management needs to therefore have a “plan” so folks who are able to telecommute share in telecommuting.
  • Some can’t do it
    • Some employees aren’t able to focus or be productive without an office environment. Some exceptions must be made in these circumstances as these employees might be less productive telecommuting.
  • Some jobs aren’t right for it
    • Service jobs require on-site, for example.
  • Management by attendance mindset
    • Need for metrics
      • Managers need to measure productivity. Sometimes, managers use management by attendance. Simply stated, this attendance method means that …If you’re at work, you MUST be doing something. Seriously?

Not to create a false equivalency in the benefits and challenges section above, the argument for telecommuting, at least part time, far outstrips the arguments against.

Conclusion

The technology for a telecommuting workforce is here today (and has been for 20 years or more) so why are we still sitting in cars, in traffic, hours each day? By working offsite, for those jobs (many of them), which allow it, we could reduce our carbon footprint, be more productive, and happier. And, companies who embrace telecommuting could enjoy greater profitability with more productive (and better rested) employees.

There is more hope than in years past for teleworking. So, as workers have worked remotely during the Coronovirus pandemic, many, if not most, managers, have realized that remote work isn’t so bad after all.

Let’s get with it!

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Please read our disclaimer available from our home page

Are Email Hacks Inevitable? NO! NO! NO!

What’s up with Email Hacking?!

With so many stories about email hacking, you’d have to think it’s inevitable, right?

NO! NO! NO! EMAIL HACKING IS NOT (AND SHOULD NEVER BE CONSIDERED) NORMAL!

The Problem:

Because of weak email passwords and no email encryption as “the norm”, email sits on (Internet) servers unprotected behind, often, weak front-end security. Just like a plain text file, if a hacker successfully attacks the server, then all the emails are there for the taking and can easily be read.

Popular web-based email services ALL WORK THIS WAY (Protonmail being one obvious exception). Thus, if you don’t take steps to protect your email, your un-encrypted emails might be in the next email hack you read about. But you say, you don’t have anything in your emails “to worry about”. That’s not really the point. And, upon closer inspection, you probably wouldn’t want your emails totally open to hackers, either.

The Solution:

With just two basic steps, you can almost totally avoid the chances of your email ever being compromised.

Step 1: Use strong passwords on your email accounts!

It’s a sad fact that year after year, most people do not use strong passwords and even re-use weak passwords across email accounts. “Password1” remains the most popular password since it “passes” most password checkers for upper-lower case, a number, and length. Unfortunately, if you use this password, you aren’t using a password at all since this is one of the first a hacker would use in an attack on your email server!

How about a much stronger email password like: 8Y6N2U}(@8N2u8/?Rie9@b=9. ?

——

Step 2: Encrypt your email!

This isn’t new technology, either. Hello, it’s been here for…decades. So, what do we mean by “encryption”?

Two types:

(1) Transport. That is, when you send your email the transport layer should be encrypted. But, transport encryption only encrypts your email on its way to your own email server (and not beyond your server to other email servers). Therefore, what’s the point of securing your email for only part of its journey and then again if the email finally just sits unprotected on the server itself? So, then there’s:

(2) End-to-End encryption. Here, novices will suggest to you that you can encrypt your email and send them the “password” to the recipient. This “Symmetric Encryption”, where the same password encrypts and decrypts, is weak since you must transmit the password itself. The weakness with this approach is that hackers could also intercept that password thus voiding your encryption attempt.

A much stronger approach is to use PGP or other Public Key Encryption email setup for your sensitive emails. With this method, you share your “public” key, but keep your private key private. Thus, this approach overcomes the weakness with symmetric encryption: you do not need to transmit the password.

Setting up PGP can be a little daunting for computer novices. You need to install the program, set up a “keyring”, generate keys, and other one-time setup items. You can also select how long a “key” you want to generate. (A skilled computer user could set up an email client to use encryption as described in about 30 minutes.)

Best yet, popular programs like Mac Mail, Thunderbird (on Mac/Windows) and others, have support for email encryption once you set up the keyring.

You can also just encrypt some text in a window and save that without even using an email program or encrypt a file on your computer. These encryption programs like PGP (and GPG, the free alternative) install right-click menus (shell extensions) so you can encrypt files/text in other places rather than just in emails.

KEY POINT: With encrypted email, your emails remain encrypted on the server until you decrypt them, thus making them useless to hackers (and to other snoops)

Hackers (and other snoops): Good luck decrypting and reading this email:

hQIMA1n71tMYS1g+ARAAryKaRxDQcyd3zjiCRzZe2ZFu9z27ZUFQvPp+NT+8fA2E 8cDDTHPH1gqtlXMKexz4+lsXK73DahsiE9horLJCCF8l5gfsjaj4kWle+XkhBZD8 UAYFyoyWJ6x2AFlh1S2f7vm/xpg3NxAjWyBVD9GypN88xiCk/J154kzHgGm52aCo EwqJ97SiRnPl+/EzbxfouJp9uFPX+VP1b3PMMk6jGLC7+Clhd6sng4YGHvr4OTqH S7DvFxeq7YB9CJFxe76DS6ipEcQqpWEud63VnYrbcJ1r0EU6fAmEvvXDIaoyEL6b pZ8Vz9UM2gsSKQ6zyJqSUo3XHqCsWLstVH1tzJUgFRbnOmJ9LYzwMrrbQykB/BX3 lEZNKLtHNgvtYUKXzmKcZeMKClvvcU/JVDgh5pMUYu1EIB19tPRQtBMre/HqSt+p 5R6edPuZ9PQbNrgfZ49lIbE01ZzrvW6wEhRpn7m33F9xnkrmGNuH0VwwHWuuQ0na ovVj/uXjZeCnHoCsNiqiV7tBZ9czzGq81emCE5CMswKBciO9EB72laXeebQNqFEu XhhmA8yLeANWlk+PogYQh4drrh1VVroK8eTJMN6n1wcICjTL5QDyaFHfX4C7jSMX k7ERBYKU7sJI4KqTvMREbLB9Mse7o7AebdPfwUY2bvIRjcSlPk4z2XlXbAPW2ofS TwEAo0hVPS1Uq1hbhnZemjFzoVy1gCoRUniA234Vm8TAA6ckZ4d1v1jRCgBRHVvZ
oylFIyXuvcnEGGIx57xucxI8XBe6WeGEur2ZUDUrwLg==jxG6

Best yet, the tools mentioned here, like GPG, and the related PC and mac encryption plug-ins are….FREE.

Conclusion:

While it’s disconcerting in 2016, from all the email hacking disclosures, that our elected officials, and government in general, remain clueless about basic email security, that doesn’t mean you have to! Just do a couple basic steps as outlined above to all but eliminate (if not totally eliminate) hackers getting to your email (or being able to read your email even if they do!).

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Please read our disclaimer available from our home page

What Ever Happened To Critical Thinking?

In the world where “opinions” travel through the Internet at light speed often presented as “facts”, how do you know what you can believe? If there is a single skill that is necessary for day to day living it’s being able to think critically. That is, being able to separate the silly from the factual, the rational from the irrational, and the biased from the unbiased. Of all the skills taught in schools, critical thinking never takes front stage. Thus, sooner rather than later, you’re on your own to think, or to try and think, critically.

Here Is a Common Example:

Say an advertisement says their product cleans better than “the leading competitor” by 500%. Of course, 500% sounds big, but 500% just means five times “something”. If the “something” is small to begin with, then five times that amount may not be significantly greater. So, when an advertisement says that a product cleans 500% better than the “leading competitor”, some of the questions that might come to mind include:

– Was there any serious investigation done at all or is this ad just a silly claim?

– Is that cleaning increase significant? What if the leading competitor’s cleaning metric is only 0.00034. Then five times that number is only 0.0017. Significant? Should I care?

– What does “better” mean in this context?

– Who is the leading competitor?

– 500% of “what” (objectively-obtained) cleaning metric?

– How did the investigators measure this claimed cleaning improvement?

– Can I trust the numbers from this source (the advertiser itself)?

– What kind of data were gathered? Nominal, ratio, etc?

– Were the cleaning tests done objectively or subjectively by (possibly paid by company) human “evaluators”?

– How many cleaning trials did the company do?

– What kind of lighting did the investigators use to view/measure cleaning differences?

– How did the company make comparisons to the “leading competitor”?

– Did the company use statistical methods? If so, which ones? At what significance level? With what assumptions? (where can I find those analyses data?)

– What types of clothes did the company use for comparisons (all white cotton clothing or clothing with colors more difficult to judge cleanliness differences between products)?

– What types of stains (dirt, oil, etc.) did the company use?

– Does the company have a “celebrity spokesperson”? Almost always, a celebrity endorser is a red flag. Logically speaking, a celebrity endorsor is: “The Fallacy of the Irrelevant Authority”. Of course, a celebrity endorser who is paid just to endorse the product doesn’t mean the product doesn’t work. In any case, since the celebrity endorsor rarely knows anything about the product he or she is endorsing, a celebrity endorsor demonstrates persuasion via personality – not logic.

With these critical questions, and others you might think of, you’ll be in a better position not to have, in this case, advertising, sway you with their (often unsubstantiated) messages.

From the critical questions above, we can generalize to say that good general critical thinking skills include:

  • Curiosity – Wanting to learn more information about things around us.
  • Skepticism – Not always believing, without investigation, and not blindly accepting what we hear.
  • Objective Research Methods – Objective methods to test hypotheses. Verify data. Repeat results. Break a large problem into smaller ones if necessary.
  • Humility– The ability to rationally admit we were wrong about a belief or idea.
  • Thinking logically not emotionally

Example of Critical Thinking in Action:

When researchers start an experiment, they often have a belief on what the outcome will be. Yet, if the objective experiment’s results don’t match those pre-conceptions a researcher had, the researcher accepts the results.

Stop! You’re Not Making Sense to Begin With!

Be wary of claims where the claim itself makes no sense to begin with. If a claim says that something is 2 times smaller, or takes 4 times less time, you need to clarify that claim’s hypothesis. Since “1 times” = 100%, you can’t exceed that amount for something that’s less than 100% in some dimension (time, space, etc.). In other words, it’s impossible that something can be 2 times smaller or take 300% less time. (a measurement could be one-half as large, but not twice as small.) With imprecisely or incorrectly (or mathematically impossible) stated claims, you might correctly conclude that the claims themselves need serious investigation or clarification (and doubt).

Secondary Data

The additional problem we have is that all of the data we get is (at best) secondary data. That is, since we didn’t get the data ourselves, we have to believe (or somehow verify) that the data we got are accurate. Thus, we need to know who got the data, what their agendas might be, if any, and so on. Can we dismiss diet claims from diet company commercials? Well, show us the data! How was the data gathered? By whom? Etc. (Having a healthy diet and exercise and avoiding diets – in the first place – would be recommended, but never mentioned on these commercials.).

Conclusion:

Thinking critically is the a critical skill you need to have your entire life. You may never need to use Avogadro’s number or solve a differential equation, but critical thinking is something you can use every day to separate the silly from the factual, the rational from the irrational, and the biased from the unbiased.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Please read our disclaimer available from our home page

Are you paying for a proprietary Word Processor?

With all the zero-day exploits and other hacks on the DOC format, as one example. it’s amazing people still use it. Who feels comfortable double-clicking a “.DOC” file received in an email? Ahhh, well, ahhh, ….

Instead, why not just use a really great text editor? Text is the common denominator. No company can stake out “text” as proprietary and then hold you over a barrel to extract higher and higher fees with more and more restrictive Terms and Conditions.

Some companies with proprietary word processors now demand you pay a monthly fee (a “subscription” – $-$-$: Drip-Drip-Drip) to use their software. Stop paying and guess what happens? If you really need the Office Formats, why not check out the free Office Suite LibreOffice (a favorite of students and professionals)? Additionally, also consider other office suites such as Google Docs that are also free. And, as of April, 2017, Apple now offers, free of charge, all its iWork products including Pages, Numbers, and Keynote!

The great news, however, is that regular text editors are free, plentiful, and universally understood. Text is also distraction-free: you just type the text! Every program understands text. Moreover, most non-bare-bones text editors include powerful search and other features for professionals. And, text editors now support images and other advanced features.

So, why not get off the “We Got You” proprietary model merry-go-round?

Declare your independence using text today!

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Please read our disclaimer available from our home page